• David Martin

What Does a Pop Band & ERISA Have in Common?



They were both in a recent case opinion written by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman in Johnston v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 2017 WL 4654431(M.D. Fla. 2017).

Judge Goodman pulled lyrics from No Doubt’s song “Don’t Speak” to illustrate the Plaintiff’s case wherein he was seeking an explanation as to exactly why his claim for long term disability benefits has been rejected.

“In their song ‘Don’t Speak,’ the rock band No Doubt sang the following lament about being rejected: ‘Don’t speak / I know what you’re thinking / I don’t need your reasons / Don’t tell me cause it hurts.’ But in the instant case, the Plaintiff urges a completely contrary theme: he wants to know why he was rejected.”

A common problem in ERISA cases is that little information is provided by insurance companies as to why they have rejected a claim. In particular, Aetna has been chastised before for using boilerplate language to deny a claim. In Helms v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., 222 F. App'x 821, 830 (11th Cir. 2007), the Court found that

“No reasonable interpretation of Aetna's plan documents permitted Aetna to send boilerplate letters that did not sufficiently disclose Aetna's reasons for the denial of Helms's STD claim.”

In this case, not only had Aetna failed to provide clear enough reasons as to why it denied Dr. Johnston’s disability claim, but in litigation, it had also wanted to deny discovery and require the Court to make a decision on what it had compiled and considered to be the administrative record.

One of the key issues regarding discovery pertained to the attorney-client communications between Aetna and its attorneys before the lawsuit was filed as well as communications after the lawsuit was filed but before the final decision was made. Since the attorneys were supposed to be representing the plan, which is to be operated in the interests of participants and beneficiaries, the Court easily permitted discovery regarding communications between Aetna and its attorneys before suit was filed. The Court also permitted discovery and agreed to conduct an in camera inspection regarding attorney client communications which occurred before a final decision was made and after a lawsuit was filed.

#ERISAdisabilitylawyer #ERISA #longtermdisability #longtermdisabilitylawyer

Contact us today for a free initial consultation.

The Martin Law Group is dedicated to being your go-to ERISA attorneys and long term disability lawyers. Whether you are pursuing a long-term disability claim, life insurance benefits, or your pension or retirement benefits, we will meet with you face-to-face to discuss your claim at a location convenient for you. 

 

In an effort to make disability claims as easy as possible, we offer a free initial consultation. We often work with clients in Huntsville, Mobile, Birmingham, Montgomery, Dothan, Tuscaloosa, and Florence, in Alabama, as well as with clients in Columbus, Meridian, Jackson, Hattiesburg, Tupelo, and Gulfport, Mississippi, and surrounding areas.

Contact us today for a free consultation.

800-284-9309

info@erisacase.com

Tuscaloosa Office

2117 Jack Warner Pkwy
Suite #1
Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35401
Toll-Free: 800-284-9309
Local: 205-343-1771

Birmingham Office

The WSK Building
2323 2nd Avenue North
Birmingham, Alabama 35203
Toll-Free: 800-284-9309
Local: 205-343-1771
  • Long term disability lawyer
  • ERISA disability lawyer
  • Retirement benefits lawyer

© 2020 by The Martin Law Group, LLC

Sitemap | Legal Disclaimers | Privacy Policy

Website proudly created by Cartography Consulting.

DISCLAIMER: These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.